FileMaker Server 19.2 supports upgrades from versions 16,ġ7, 18, and 19.1 without having to uninstall previous versions.

More server versions with the redesigned setup wizard. Installation tools, speed enhancements, and compatibility packages that make a strong Is out and we're happy to report, you should! Included in 19.2 are new Here atĭB Services, our clients always ask us if they should upgrade when a new release Your shotty review is seen as grain of salt though my personal experienced eyes and hands on knowledge of FileMaker.This release of the server platform delivers many functionalĮnhancements that developers and administrators can be excited about. I assume you have no real use for such powerful software and or have zero idea how to scale FileMaker to its best abilities. You have no idea what you're yammering on about the multi-billion dollar oil company I work for employes FileMaker, it's rich with features that are usefull, easy to use and the server application has been extremely rugged and very useful. Then that would be something to be proud of. Integrate with iCloud (competing with Amazon and Google offerings), and server-based commercial databases, such as Oracle. Hire top experts to design and implement such a system correctly and cleanly leaving no remnants of the old Filemaker (there's nothing there worth keeping). Then, OpenOffice? Another mediocre attempt at creating a PC-based RDBMS.įilemaker should be scrapped. The last release allows one to push an Access application to a server, but you cannot use most 'strengths' of the Access system. MS Access is far superior, and it's still a mediocre product that gets worse with age, adding bloat to bloat, with each release. It has and I guess always will be an expensive commercial product that is no more than a first year computer science class project without the input from professor telling them how to separate the relational database subsystem from the view of the database contents, or instructing them on relational database theory. It's design and implementation shows a thorough lack of knowledge of relational database theory and practice.

I've played with Filemaker over the years and have always come away not only disappointed but outraged.

Filemaker pro 12 vs access